Cleveland: Police cases over 137-shot barrage still unsettled 5 years later – Five fired officers reinstated

In this Nov. 30, 2012, file forensics photo released by the Office of the Ohio Attorney General, bullet trajectories are marked on a Chevy Malibu riddled with gunshots after a high-speed chase that ended in the deaths of two unarmed suspects in Cleveland. Nearly five years after two unarmed black suspects died in a 137-shot barrage of Cleveland police gunfire, five officers fired for their roles are set to return to duty this week after an arbitrator reinstated their jobs. Meanwhile, discipline and criminal charges against some officers involved in the case remain unsettled, lingering in what a union leader and a defense attorney describe as an unfair limbo. (Office of the Ohio Attorney General via AP, File)

By MARK GILLISPIE,  Associated Press  CLEVELAND (AP) 10/23 — Nearly five years after two unarmed black suspects died in a 137-shot barrage of Cleveland police gunfire, five officers fired for their roles are set to return to duty this week after an arbitrator reinstated their jobs.

Meanwhile, discipline and criminal charges against some officers involved in the case remain unsettled, lingering in what a union leader and a defense attorney describe as an unfair limbo.

Five supervisors accused of dereliction of duty are on restricted duty while waiting to see whether those charges are re-filed in a different court, and dozens of patrol officers disciplined for their roles in the chase await an arbitrator’s decision on whether to rescind that discipline.

Driver Timothy Russell and passenger Malissa Williams were killed in a suburban school parking lot in November 2012 after a chase that reached speeds of 100 mph and involved more than 60 police cars and 100 officers. The shootings drew international attention for the ferociousness of the police gunfire and questions about how and why it even happened.

The chase started with a beat-up Chevy Malibu driven by Russell backfiring as it passed Cleveland police headquarters. The sound reverberated off downtown buildings, convincing an officer outside that he’d been shot at.

The chase ended in an East Cleveland school parking lot where Russell and Williams had nowhere to run. A patrolman fired the first shot when Russell drove toward him. Twelve other officers, believing the officer had been shot at, began firing at the Malibu in what’s been described as a dangerous crossfire situation.

The families of Russell and Williams split $3 million paid by the city to settle a resulting lawsuit.

Six of the 13 officers who shot their weapons were fired, and an arbitrator ordered in June that five of them be reinstated. The exception was patrolman Michael Brelo, who was charged with involuntary manslaughter for firing 49 rounds, including the last 15 from the hood of the Malibu. A judge acquitted him at trial in May 2015.

Five supervisors accused of failing to control the chase remain on restricted duty with their cases unresolved. The former county prosecutor dropped their misdemeanor dereliction of duty charges in Cuyahoga County court, where the charges would have been heard by the judge who acquitted Brelo, and said those charges would be tried in East Cleveland. But charges against the supervisors haven’t been filed there, a defense attorney said.

Willa Hemmons, East Cleveland’s prosecutor and law director, said Friday that she’s waiting on Judge William Dawson to decide whether to proceed and put their cases on his docket. She said the county prosecutor’s office has given her the evidence gathered for the case.

“I’m prepared to go forward with the trial whenever judge Dawson gives me the go ahead,” Hemmons said. “I haven’t had any conversations at all with the judge. As soon as he puts it on his docket, I will be prepared to litigate it.”

Dawson didn’t return telephone messages Friday.

For now, the five police supervisors aren’t allowed to interact with the public or earn additional money from moonlighting, and they’re stripped of their city-issued handguns.

Brian Betley, president of the Fraternal Order of Police chapter that represents the supervisors, said he’s frustrated that they remain “in limbo.”

“There needs to be some closure to it,” Betley said Friday. “Go ahead with trial or drop the whole thing and dismiss it — game over.”

David Grant, an attorney for one of the supervisors, said the situation is unfair. He said it’s his understanding that the office of the new county prosecutor, Michael O’Malley, wants no involvement in the case.

“They’ve been in limbo for years now,” Grant said. “We think the case should be dismissed. It’s a massive waste of taxpayer money.”

Dozens of officers who received lesser discipline, such as unpaid time off, for their roles in the chase are waiting to hear whether an arbitrator decides to rescind that discipline, according to the president of the union that represents patrol officers.

Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association President Steve Loomis said the disciplinary process following the 2012 shootings has been “driven by politics and the media.”

Loomis is known for his bombast in his defense and advocacy of patrol officers, but he also sounded a somewhat conciliatory note on Friday, saying some things have changed for the better since 2012.

“We need to move forward and put this behind us,” Loomis said. “And keep working to make these improvements to ensure the safety of officers and the public.”

 

 

Posted in: Acquittals, Civilian Complaints, Courts & Trials, Excessive Force, Investigations, Judges, Lawsuits, Policies & Practices, Racial Issues, Shootings, Use of Deadly Force

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eight − three =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.