Connecticut: 8 lawsuits settled in 10 months – Former Enfield officer accused of excessive force in multiple cases

In this 2013 file photo, former Enfield Police Department K9 Officer Matthew Worden and his dog Falco negotiate a low crawl obstacle during the annual K9 Olympics in Mansfield, Connecticut. Eight brutality lawsuits settled over the past 10 months paint a disturbing picture of Worden. The allegations include the officer punching people in the face when they were already subdued and smashing a man's face to the pavement causing him to lose two front teeth. Worden's lawyer denies Worden did anything wrong. (Jared Ramsdell/Journal Inquirer photo via AP)

DAVE COLLINS, Associated Press HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) 06/25— Eight brutality lawsuits settled over the past 10 months paint a disturbing picture of a former Connecticut police officer accused of beating people while they were handcuffed and ordering his police dog to attack others who were not resisting arrest.

Among other allegations, former Enfield officer Matthew Worden is accused of punching people in the face when they were already subdued, smashing a man’s face to the pavement causing him to lose two front teeth, using a stun gun multiple times on a man with a heart condition and striking a man in the groin with a baton, causing him to lose consciousness.

In a ninth case that is pending, Worden and other Enfield officers are accused of smashing Tyler Damato’s head into asphalt and shooting him with a stun gun on Christmas Day 2012, aggravating a traumatic head injury he suffered two months before when he was hit by a car. Minutes before the encounter, the man’s mother warned police about her son’s head injury.

Damato died in February 2013 after a car accident. He was 20. The lawsuit by his mother blames Worden and the other officers for his death because of the injuries they caused.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuits said they did nothing to warrant Worden’s use of force.

Worden worked for the Enfield Police Department from 2004 to 2014. He was fired after an internal affairs investigation of a beating, but town officials later changed the termination to a resignation to settle his labor grievance over the firing.

Worden, 35, now an emergency medical technician, declined to comment on the lawsuits.

His attorney, Elliot Spector, called Worden the type of officer that was respected in the past.

“They would take aggressive action,” Spector said about police years ago. “In today’s world of policing, you kind of have to step back and accept minor crimes and be tolerant. It’s all about de-escalating and being kinder and gentler. He didn’t fit into today’s culture.”

Worden did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlements. Spector called many allegations “manufactured” and said the cases were settled because it was cheaper than going to trial.

“These were all people who violated the law and acted in a way that required use of force,” Spector added.

A lawyer for several of the victims, A. Paul Spinella, disputed Spector’s characterization of Worden.

“You have a police officer who was completely and totally out of control,” Spinella said. “This officer and his group ran rampant through this town year after year after year.”

Asked about Worden and the lawsuits, Enfield Police Chief Carl Sferrazza would only say, “It is what it is.”

Town officials have refused to release any information about the settlements including payouts, which has sparked a legal fight involving public records laws.

Town officials rejected a request by the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut to release some settlement information. Officials said the town’s insurer settled the cases and keeps the records, arguing those records are not public documents. But the town council had approved the settlements.

The state Freedom of Information Commission rejected the town’s arguments and ordered officials earlier this month to release the records to the ACLU. The town’s attorney is expected to appeal that order to Superior Court.

In most publicized case against Worden, a police cruiser dashboard camera recorded Worden punching Mark Maher in the face as other officers had him pinned to the ground in 2014. Police said they were investigating possible illegal drug and alcohol use at a boat launch, while Maher said he was just smoking a cigarette with friends.

Maher was charged with interfering with police, but the charge was later dropped. His booking photo shows him with a serious injury to his right eye area, and he says he now has a permanent scar.

“He punched me quite a few times,” Maher said. “He’s just somebody who has a very short temper and can’t control themselves, somebody who shouldn’t have a badge and call himself an officer of the law.”

Enfield police prepared a warrant to charge Worden with misdemeanor assault and fabricating evidence in the Worden case. But Hartford State’s Attorney Gail Hardy rejected it, saying Worden didn’t commit any crime.

 

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

Posted in: Civilian Complaints, Excessive Force, Internal Affairs, Lawsuits, Police Brutality/Abuse of Authority, Policies & Practices, Use of Force

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

four × 5 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.