Echoes of Al Capone in current gun-control debate – Second Amendment Foundation: There’s no equivalency between assault [type] rifles and machine guns

Chicago gangster Al Capone has his photo taken while in custody in Philadelphia, May 18, 1929, on charges of carrying concealed weapons. It was gangland violence by Capone and others that spurred Congress to pass the first significant federal gun-control law in 1934. (AP Photo)

By ALLEN G. BREED and SHARON COHEN,  AP National Writers  CHICAGO (AP) 03/15  — It was 1934. Mobsters armed with fully automatic “Tommy guns” had left a trail of bloodstained sidewalks and pockmarked walls across the country, and the new president had narrowly escaped assassination the year before. It was time for action on gun control. And the National Rifle Association seemingly agreed.

“I do not believe in the general promiscuous toting of guns,” then-NRA President Karl T. Frederick told members of the House Ways and Means Committee. “I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses.”EDS NOTE: GRAPHIC CONTENT:

The resulting National Firearms Act — passed five years after the infamous St. Valentine’s Day Massacre in Chicago — taxed, rather than banned, machine guns. But it was a pivotal moment in America’s history, marking the first comprehensive federal gun-control law.

This Feb. 14, 1929, photo shows the bodies of six of the seven men who were slain in the gangland Valentine’s Day Massacre on Chicago’s North Side. The gang hit attributed to Al Capone was one of many violent acts that spurred Congress to pass the nation’s first sweeping gun control law, the National Firearms Act of 1934. (AP Photo/File)


It was also a big moment for the NRA, founded in 1871 by two Civil War veterans. The group had managed to get a seat at the table — helping to gut most of the bill’s original provisions and establishing itself as a key player in Washington, D.C.

Now the survivors of a modern-day Valentine’s Day massacre — last month’s rampage in Parkland, Florida — are demanding that members of Congress sever their ties with the NRA and do something about assault rifles like the legally purchased AR-15 Nikolas Cruz allegedly used.

As it was in 1934, the debate over gun control is essentially the same — whether civilians should have access to certain kinds of firearms.

“Americans then believed you had a right to have a gun in your house for personal protection,” says Adam Winkler, a professor at the UCLA School of Law and author of “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.” ”What they didn’t believe was that you had a right to have the most deadly forms of weapons.”

Introduced too late for World War I, the Thompson sub-machine gun was marketed as the perfect self-defense weapon — “ideal … for the protection of large estates, ranches, plantations, etc.,” read one 1920s advertisement from its manufacturer. “Full automatic, fired from the hip, 1,500 shots per minute.”

Despite assurances the weapon would only be sold “to responsible parties after a thorough investigation,” many found their way into the hands of bootleggers and bank robbers. Gangsters Al Capone, John Dillinger and George “Machine Gun” Kelly began terrorizing the nation, and forensics tied two Tommy guns to the Feb. 14, 1929, incident in which seven men associated with mobster George “Bugs” Moran were gunned down by Capone men dressed as police.

John Dillinger’s arsenal is seen, April 24, 1934, after federal agents tried to capture him and his gang in their hideout in the Little Bohemia roadhouse in Mercer, Wis. Dillinger was among the gangsters mentioned as Congress debated the first significant federal gun-control law, the National Firearms Act of 1934. (AP Photo)


Then in February 1933, during a visit to Miami, President-elect Roosevelt emerged miraculously unscathed from a barrage of five bullets from a .32-caliber pawnshop revolver. Hearings on the National Firearms Act began in April 1934.

The original bill proposed registration and steep taxation on all firearms. There were also provisions for taking fingerprints and tracking future gun transfers.

Then-Assistant Attorney General Joseph B. Keenan readily acknowledged that criminals would ignore the law. But by requiring taxes and registration, he said, “we do hope to make it a simple matter … to put them behind the bars when they violate these regulations.”

The NRA had been pushing a measure in state legislatures to regulate machine guns, but worried Congress was trying to go too far. During hearings, the Second Amendment was not mentioned by name, but its spirit was certainly invoked.

NRA Executive Vice President Milton Reckord accused the government of seeking to regulate firearms “under the subterfuge of a tax bill” and warned against legislating “15 million sportsmen into criminals.” A pistol or revolver is “only dangerous in the hands of the crook,” he said. “It is not dangerous in the hands of the honest citizen.”

The final law imposed a $200 tax on the making and sale of machine guns, silencers, and shotguns and rifles with barrels of less than 18 inches. Handguns and “sporting arms” were exempted, as the NRA wished.

Despite the general aura of collegiality and collaboration in 1934, historian Patrick Charles says the NRA was doing then what it does now — fighting to thwart any significant restrictions on guns.

“The whole time the NRA is saying, ‘We support reasonable firearms laws, and we’re just trying to help you.’ Basically, what they did is they got their hands in the cookie jar to write the law for Congress, and they commandeered the whole law and made it the way they wanted to,” says Charles, author of “Armed in America: A History of Gun Rights from Colonial Militias to Concealed Carry.”

Over the ensuing eight decades, mob killings, assassinations, crime waves and politics have dictated federal gun laws. The NFA was followed by the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the “Brady Law” of 1993 and the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994. That last expired in 2004. Numerous attempts to renew it have failed.

Like many, Charles thought the 2012 slaughter of 26 students and teachers in Newtown, Connecticut, was another of those moments in “the shooting cycle” that would spur new federal gun control. It wasn’t.

Survivors of the Parkland shooting are vowing that this time will be different. They want an outright ban on assault-style rifles, which Stoneman Douglas senior Samuel Zeif, in a White House meeting with President Donald Trump, called “a weapon of war.”

But Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, says this is not 1934, and there’s no equivalency between assault rifles and machine guns. While the Parkland students make “some very sympathetic messengers,” he doesn’t foresee anything changing.

“No gun rights group is going to support a ban,” he says. “A gun doesn’t have a finger to pull its own trigger or a brain to hate with. There’s where our problem is.”


Breed reported from Raleigh, N.C.’s-gun-control-debate

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in: Crime & Criminals, Firearms, Gun Control, Homicide, Lawfully Armed Citizens, Legislation, Mass Casualty Attacks, Organized Crime, Politics, Public Policy, Public Safety, School Shootings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

19 − 16 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.