‘Innocent Man’ inmate to walk free after 35 years in prison, but for how long?

In this Saturday, Aug. 22, 2015 file photo, best selling author John Grisham speaks to an attendee of the Mississippi Book Festival, at Galloway Methodist Church Sanctuary in Jackson, Miss. Karl Fontenot, one of the subjects of Grisham's book The Innocent Man, who has spent more than 35 years behind bars for the 1984 kidnapping and slaying of a convenience store clerk in Ada, Okla., is just days away from walking out of prison after a federal judge tossed his conviction. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis, File)

By SEAN MURPHY,  Associated Press  OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) 12/17 — An Oklahoma man is just days away from walking out of prison after a federal judge decided he has spent 35 years in prison for a kidnapping and murder that evidence indicates he likely didn’t commit, and yet his freedom could be short-lived.

U.S. District Judge James Payne in August ordered Karl Fontenot, 55, to be released by Thursday, writing in his nearly 200-page decision that newly discovered evidence provides “solid proof of Mr. Fontenot’s probable innocence.” The judge cited numerous problems with his conviction including: new evidence establishing an alibi and other suspects; sloppy police work; bungled crime scenes; and the prosecutor’s withholding of evidence and knowing use of false testimony, among other things.

“This pattern and practice resulted in a systemic due process violation of Mr. Fontenot’s constitutional rights,” the judge wrote of the case that John Grisham featured in a bestselling book and Netflix documentary.

Nevertheless, Oklahoma’s attorney general is appealing the decision, and local prosecutors are mulling whether to retry Fontenot.

“We have not made a decision,” said District Attorney Paul Smith, the prosecutor tasked with a potential retrial. “I’ve requested assistance from the (Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation) to kind of rework the case and to give me an opinion on the efficacy of that, and that’s ongoing.”

Smith declined to elaborate on his thinking about whether to retry Fontenot, saying he didn’t want to jeopardize the pending appeal or any future trial.

The convictions of Fontenot and co-defendant, Thomas Ward were based almost entirely on accounts they said they retrieved from dreams. These “dream confessions” came after hours of interrogation by Ada police and state agents. Those investigators were desperate to solve the disappearance of convenience store clerk Donna Denice Haraway in 1984, just two years after the unsolved rape and murder of another young woman in the small central Oklahoma town.

After the details of both men’s confessions were proven untrue — Haraway’s body was discovered years later in a different location and had been shot to death not stabbed as the pair had said — a state appeals court ordered new trials. Local prosecutors again secured their convictions, based largely on their confessions.

Videotaped confessions, including those obtained from Ward and Fontenot, are powerful tools for prosecutors to present to a jury, but a surprising number of confessions in murder cases have been proven to be false, said Vanessa Potkin, director of post-conviction litigation at the New York-based Innocence Project.

“As DNA exoneration cases show us, a staggering number of people routinely falsely confess to crimes they didn’t commit,” Potkin said. “One-fourth of the people proven innocent by DNA testing made admissions and confessed during a custodial interrogation to a crime they were completely innocent of. It is much more common than people tend to believe.”

In this Wednesday, July 24, 2013 file photo, Tiffany Murphy, director of the Oklahoma Innocence Project at Oklahoma City University’s School of Law, answers a question at a news conference in Oklahoma City. Murphy is the attorney for Karl Fontenot, who has spent more than 35 years behind bars for the 1984 kidnapping and slaying of a convenience store clerk in Ada, Okla., and is is just days away from walking out of prison after a federal judge tossed his conviction. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki, File)


Potkin said Fontenot’s confession shares many characteristics common among false confessions, including a suspect with a low IQ, a lengthy interview with seasoned detectives that was conducted off camera, and investigators who provided Fontenot with details about the crime during questioning.

“Most people believe they would never confess to a crime they didn’t commit, but the reason most people say that is that they’ve never been inside of an interrogation room with skilled detectives who are highly trained,” she said.

Fontenot’s attorney, Tiffany Murphy, said her client understands his freedom hangs in the balance.

“He was extremely excited to be found actually innocent, which he is,” Murphy said in a brief telephone interview with The Associated Press. “But he also understands that this is not over.”

The convictions of Ward and Fontenot have come under intense scrutiny for years and have been the subject of numerous books, including Grisham’s “The Innocent Man,” which he produced into a six-part documentary.

The books and documentary also feature the high-profile exoneration of Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, who both were convicted in the 1982 killing of Ada waitress Debra Sue Carter. The case featured the same cast of investigators and prosecutors, along with the same jailhouse informant who testified against Ward and Fontenot. Williamson at one point came within days of being executed. Both were later freed.

Murphy, now a law professor at the University of Arkansas, first took up Fontenot’s case more than six years ago when she was the head of the Oklahoma Innocence Project.

Fontenot’s supporters have been collecting clothes, furniture and other necessities for him, and secured a place where he can live after his release.

Ward’s appeal is proceeding separately in state court, and he remains imprisoned at the R.B. Conner Correctional Center in Hominy, Oklahoma.


Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in: Confessions, Conviction Integrity, Convictions, Court Rulings, Courts & Trials, Crime & Criminals, Investigations, Judges, Police, Prosecutors, State Attorneys

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eight − 1 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.