Key Witness: Police officers in polygamous Utah and Arizona towns routinely ignore eviction related property crimes

JACQUES BILLEAUD, Associated Press PHOENIX (AP) 10/24 — A key witness in the federal government’s effort to disband the police department in a polygamous community on the Arizona-Utah border told a judge Monday that officers routinely turn a blind eye to property crimes.

Jeff Barlow, executive director of the trust that owns most of the real estate in the twin polygamous towns, said officers work against his group in carrying out evictions on homes and commercial properties in Colorado City, Arizona, and Hildale, Utah.

Barlow said the police department, known as the Colorado City Marshal’s Office, won’t investigate cases where soon-to-be-evicted residents rip out water heaters, air conditioning units and other fixtures from the trust-owned homes. He also said officers routinely let residents ignore eviction notices on houses that are not supposed to be occupied.

“There is absolutely nothing done about it by the Marshal’s Office,” Barlow said of property crimes at the homes. “It continues to be prevalent.”

The focus of a four-day hearing in Phoenix this week will examine remedies that U.S. District Judge H. Russel Holland could order in response to a jury’s finding in a civil rights case seven months ago that nonbelievers were denied police protection, building permits and water hookups in the towns.

A key issue will be what steps to take to overhaul the police department.

The trust wants a federal judge to appoint an official who will have the power to hire and fire officers. The U.S. Justice Department has gone a step further by asking the judge to disband the police department, get county sheriffs to take over policing duties and appoint an official to monitor town operations for the court.

The towns vigorously oppose those requests. Their lawyers say other police departments targeted in federal civil rights investigations have not faced remedies as drastic as disbandment. They acknowledged the department has had problems in the past but said no officers have lost their certification since 2007.

Barlow testified that officers have repeatedly threatened the trust’s property manager with trespassing charges as he tries to carry out evictions. The property manager brings a videographer along as protection.

Travis Meadows of the Arizona Department of Public Safety said he discovered the towns’ officers waited as long as two years to complete some police reports on property crimes.

The civil rights case against the towns marks one of the battles the federal government is waging to rein in the sect’s activities, which prosecutors say are dictated by their jailed leader and prophet, Warren Jeffs. He is serving a life sentence in a Texas for sexually assaulting underage girls he considered wives.

Also this year, federal prosecutors charged 11 group members, including several high-ranking leaders, with carrying out a multimillion-dollar food stamp fraud scheme over several years. The suspects have pleaded not guilty and are awaiting trial.

In the Arizona case, the jury found the Colorado City Marshal’s Office violated the rights of nonbelievers by breaking the First Amendment’s promise that government won’t show preference to a particular faith and force religion upon people.

Jurors concluded that officers treated nonbelievers inequitably when providing police protection, arrested them without having probable cause and made unreasonable searches of their property.

At trial this spring, the towns denied the discrimination allegations and said the government was persecuting officials because it disapproved of their faith.

The U.S. Justice Department said the police force is afflicted by an entrenched culture of following the edicts of Jeffs at the expense of the rights of nonbelievers.

Federal authorities alleged the towns operated as an arm of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a radical offshoot of mainstream Mormonism, which disavowed polygamy more than 100 years ago.

James Schoppmann, special counsel for the Mohave County Sheriff’s Office, said the agency is willing to take over police services for the two towns. The community’s police department should have been disbanded a long time ago, he said.

“It’s the only way there will be lasting relief,” Schoppmann said.

Posted in: Civilian Complaints, Misconduct/Abuse of Authority, Police, Policies & Practices

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two × one =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.