Less like boot camp? Connecticut mulls police training changes – Report: ‘Police should embrace a guardian — rather than a warrior — mindset’

Tactical field training of the police. (Stock Photo: somsak suwanput/Shutterstock.com)

By DAVE COLLINS,  Associated Press  HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) 02/08 — Connecticut officials are being urged to consider removing the boot camp mentality from police training and instead use teaching methods aimed at improving the public’s trust in law enforcement.

The recommendation is one of many in a new report to state lawmakers by a task force comprised of police officials, local politicians and academics that was formed in response to police-involved shootings across the country and questions about how officers are trained.

The panel noted that former President Barack Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing supported less militaristic police training.

“Police cannot build community trust if officers were seen as an occupying force coming in from outside to impose control on the community,” the state task force report says, quoting research on the subject and the Obama panel. “It was recommended that police should embrace a guardian — rather than a warrior — mindset to build trust and legitimacy both within agencies and with the public.”

The so-called “guardian” method was developed in Washington state, where it has been in use since 2013. The thinking is that by removing the drill sergeant attitude and humiliation from training, recruits are better able to focus on learning, have more confidence and don’t bring resentment to their jobs, said Sue Rahr, executive director of the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission.

Rahr said the goal isn’t to create kinder, gentler cops, but to instead train ones that are better able to make decisions on their own and are respected in their communities.

Recruits still receive intensive training on defensive tactics and using firearms. More focus also is placed on law enforcement’s role under the Constitution, lessons in psychology and sociology and officer wellness, Rahr said.

“Instead of drill sergeants, we want the training officers to be role models,” said Rahr, former sheriff of King County, Washington.

Researchers currently are evaluating Washington’s program. What has been seen so far, Rahr said, is that recruits are maintaining their ideals about policing being a way to help people. Before, those ideals were being eroded by the intimidation, humiliation and combativeness of training, she said.

Rahr acknowledged that many law enforcement officials in her state remain skeptical about the teaching approach.

In Connecticut, Richard Holton, a former Hartford police sergeant who is now a Wethersfield officer, said he worried the teaching approach would “soften” recruits, possibly putting the lives of themselves and the public at greater risk when they hit the streets.

“We always should look at ways to train our police officers to better serve the public,” said Holton, a member of the Connecticut task force. “We can’t water down what we do, either. The military training aspect of it: You need that structure to make sure your goals and mission statement are achieved.”

In Connecticut, the Police Officer Standards and Training Council trains municipal police officers. Thomas Flaherty, the council’s police academy administrator, said the agency uses a combination of military-style training and “guardian” method teaching that is successful.

The state task force also is recommending continued discussions of how to improve police training with more community involvement, a mandatory statewide policy to train newly promoted supervisory officers including sergeants and lieutenants, new job evaluation standards for all police officers and releasing information on de-escalation training to the public.

The legislature’s Public Safety and Security Committee intends to hold a hearing on the recommendations. A date has not been set.

https://www.apnews.com/631ebc8fa02c455fbe3337a369f9dc83/Less-like-boot-camp?-Connecticut-mulls-cop-training-changes

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in: Community Relations, Police, Policies & Practices, Training/Education

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

16 + four =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.