Los Angeles cops cleared in death of homeless black man

In this Feb. 2, 2016 file photo, activists hold hands and pray outside outside Los Angeles Police Department headquarters following the police commission's decision finding that the shooting of Charly "Africa" Keunang was justified in Los Angeles. Three Los Angeles police officers who fatally shot Keunang, a black homeless man on Skid Row last year, will not face criminal charges according to a report released Thursday, Dec. 1, by the district attorney. (AP Photo/Amanda Lee Myers, File)

BRIAN MELLEY, Associated Press LOS ANGELES (AP) 12/01 — Three Los Angeles police officers who fatally shot a black homeless man on Skid Row last year will not face criminal charges because they acted in self-defense, according to a report released Thursday by the district attorney.

Prosecutors determined that the shooting of Charly “Africa” Keunang was justified because he grabbed a rookie officer’s gun during a struggle that ended when he was shot five times March 1, 2015.

“The officers’ reasonable assessments of the threat posed by Keunang were as grave and imminent as the officers perceived,” prosecutors wrote in a memo. “Keunang posed a high likelihood of killing officers and civilians at the very instant that he was shot.”

Officers were responding to reports that Keunang, 43, a Cameroon national, had threatened another man living on the street in the section of the city teeming with homeless people.

Video of the shooting by a bystander was viewed millions of times online and prompted protests in the city and drew comparisons with the deaths of other black men killed by officers in the U.S.

A lawyer representing Keunang’s family in a $20 million lawsuit disputed that the homeless man ever had hold of an officer’s gun. Attorney Joshua Piovia-Scott said the officers who were trained to de-escalate conflicts instead initiated a confrontation that led to the killing.

“I just think that’s a travesty of justice and just a weak decision on behalf of law enforcement authorities,” Piovia-Scott said of the decision not to prosecute any officers. “Unfortunately, it’s something we’ve seen time and time again in this scourge of police killings of unarmed black men we’ve had in this country.”

The Police Commission had previously cleared officers of the shooting, though it found one officer’s tactics violated policy. It did not publicly reveal what policy was violated.

The 22-page report by the Los Angeles district attorney’s office was based largely on video shot by officers’ body cameras, surveillance video and phone footage captured by a bystander, as well as statements from officers and other witnesses.

The report dated Nov. 9 was released Thursday after names of several witnesses were blacked out, according to Greg Risling, a spokesman for the DA. It doesn’t name who wrote the report.

The report painstakingly described the short encounter from the various view points and concluded that Keunang had ignored officers’ commands when they first tried to question him about his conflict with a man who lived in a tent nearby.

Keunang got in a standoff on a sidewalk outside his own tent with officer Francisco Martinez, who threatened to use a stun gun to subdue him if he didn’t obey orders to stand against a wall.

Keunang behaved and spoke erratically as he argued with Martinez and then dove back in his tent. When officers collapsed the tent to remove him, he sprang to his feet and wheeled around with his arms extended as if trying to strike Martinez.

The officer’s rookie partner, Joshua Volasgis, intercepted Keunang. As the two men clashed, Martinez fired his stun gun, but it had no effect because it apparently didn’t penetrate Keunang’s thick clothing, the report said.

Volasgis eventually wrestled the man to the ground and Keunang got hold of the butt of his pistol.

Volasgis, who had been on the force 10 months and was still on probation, felt his gun being removed and shouted, “He’s got my gun!”

Martinez fired once, and officer Daniel Torres and Sgt. Chand Syed each fired twice, killing Keunang.

An autopsy reported that Keunang was shot six times, but the DA’s report said one bullet probably exited and re-entered Keunang’s body, accounting for a sixth wound.

The shots were followed by shouts from a crowd. Volasgis stood up with his gun drawn and pointed it at Keunang as he backed away.

“Volasgis is slightly hunched and appears to be breathing and moving as though he is physically exhausted,” said the report, which found his gun had jammed and he never fired a round.

He and another officer then handcuffed the mortally wounded man.


Posted in: Attacks on Police, Lawsuits, Non-Lethal Alternatives, Officer Safety, Policies & Practices, Racial Issues, Tactics, Use of Deadly Force, Use of Force

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eleven + 14 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.