Maryland: Alleged office gunman got jobs, guns despite criminal past – Sentenced to 25 years in 2003, suspect served only two

Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler speaks at a news conference following a shooting at a business park in the Edgewood area of Harford County, Md., Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017. The gunman killed multiple co-workers and wounded others before fleeing the scene, Gahler said. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

By JULIET LINDERMAN,  Associated Press  BALTIMORE (AP) 10/20 — The man charged with shooting five co-workers at a Maryland granite company this week, killing three of them, is a felon with dozens of arrests and a history of attacking people he worked with. With such a troubled past, how was Radee Prince able to land a decent-paying job and acquire a gun?

It appears he may have slipped through the cracks of the criminal justice system, and presumably the companies that hired him either didn’t do a thorough background check or decided to give him a chance despite his past. Since the shooting, at least two local officials have questioned whether he should have been out on the street.

WHAT HAS PRINCE BEEN ARRESTED FOR?

Prince had more than 42 arrests in Delaware, and several more in Maryland and Washington. In 2003, he pleaded guilty to 15 counts of burglary in Delaware, and was sentenced to 25 years. However, 23 years were suspended, and he served only two years behind bars.

In March 2015, Prince was pulled over in Cecil County, Maryland, for a broken headlight. He was aggressive and screamed at an officer, who found a pistol in Prince’s car, according to court documents. He was charged with gun violations, but those charges were dropped.

Interim State’s Attorney Steven Trostle said in a statement that prosecutors concluded “that there would be insufficient evidence to convict Mr. Prince.” He didn’t offer any additional comment.

MORE CHARGES DROPPED

Prince faced multiple assault charges between 2001 and 2003 in Delaware, but they were dropped or dismissed. He was charged with offensive touching in 2014 after putting a co-worker in a chokehold, but that case was dismissed.

Last year, Prince was arrested for allegedly assaulting the same man he is accused of shooting in the head at a used car lot in Wilmington, Delaware, on Wednesday after the Maryland shooting. Those charges were dropped.

Carl Kanefsky, a spokesman for the Delaware attorney general’s office, said the case was scheduled for trial earlier this year “but the state was unable to go forward based upon available evidence and the absence of a material witness.”

Prince faces charges including murder and attempted murder. He has pleaded not guilty.

SHOULD PRINCE HAVE BEEN LOCKED UP?

In Maryland, Harford County Executive Barry Glassman said that after seeing Prince’s criminal record, he was shocked that the man wasn’t behind bars.

“The judiciary is going to have to answer for some of the decisions,” Glassman said in an interview with WBAL-AM radio. “I think there’s some serious inquiries that will have to be looked at regarding that criminal record. … It raises questions of whether it’s preventable or not.”

Wilmington Police Chief Bob Tracy said after the suspect’s arrest, “if there are violent people who are causing carnage in the community, we’ve got to find a way to keep them behind bars so they can’t go out and re-offend.”

HOW DID HE GET A GUN?

Because of Prince’s criminal record, he hadn’t been legally permitted to own a gun since his robbery conviction in 2003. It’s not clear how he got a .380 caliber pistol that authorities believe were used in the shootings.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives spokeswoman Amanda Hils said the agency initiated a trace on the gun but wouldn’t release any information about the results.

WHAT WAS HIS PAST EMPLOYMENT LIKE?

Prince had a history of intimidating co-workers and employers, and had been recently let go from a different granite company.

Just eight months ago, Prince threatened a former employer after he was fired for punching a co-worker. The owner of JPS Marble and Granite, Philip Siason, said in a request for a restraining order that Prince “came to see me, cursed and yelled … I felt very threatened because he’s a big guy and very aggressive on me.” Siason also wrote the he knew Prince had illegal guns.

A Harford County judge denied Siason’s request for a restraining order, saying only that it did not meet the burden of proof. A message left for the Harford County judge was not returned Friday.

A survivor of the rampage at Advanced Granite Solutions said several employees had complained about Prince’s behavior to their supervisors.

“Everyone was worried,” said the man, who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity because he was afraid of retaliation, and has concerns about his family’s immigration status.

Ron Cherry, an attorney for the company, said he couldn’t respond to questions about Prince.

https://www.apnews.com/eb94c4a685314070b429e54b3f0ea969/Alleged-office-gunman-got-jobs,-guns-despite-criminal-past

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Posted in: Arrests, ATF - BATFE, Crime & Criminals, Firearms, Fugitives, Homicide, Injuries, Mass Casualty Attacks, Murder/Attempted Murder, Prohibited Person/Felon in Possession, Sentencing, Shootings, Victims of Crime, Workplace Violence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 + 14 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.