Michigan House explores arming teachers, “red flag” laws to remove guns from people with mental illness symptoms

Michigan State Capitol Building. Lansing, MI. (Dmitriy Bryndin/Shutterstock.com)

By ALICE YIN,  Associated Press  LANSING, Mich. (AP) 03/03 — Michigan legislators and the governor’s office are considering two gun-control proposals: arming trained teachers and removing guns from individuals with mental health symptoms.

State capitols across America are revisiting gun legislation after the deadliest U.S. school shooting in the last five years ripped through Parkland, Florida. In Lansing, one bill under development would permit teachers and staff to carry firearms inside schools, an idea seeing national resurgence since President Donald Trump floated support in the wake of the Florida tragedy.

Other suggestions percolating in the Republican-controlled Legislature touch upon mental health, an ongoing theme in the nation’s recent gun-control conversations, though Lansing is divided on how to restrict firearms from individuals with mental illnesses. An idea already introduced in current bills — and endorsed by the governor — is “red flag” legislation to enact a procedure for temporarily confiscating guns from individuals in a threatening mental health crisis.

Michigan’s emerging legislation on school security would exempt specially trained school personnel from the state’s concealed carry restrictions in pistol-free zones, said Rep. Jim Runestad, chair of the House Judiciary Committee. Current law prohibits concealed carry inside designated gun-free zones, including schools.

“My impetus is I have a 16-year-old daughter in public school,” the White Lake Republican said. “There is nothing standing in the way of that shooter and the time lag for the police.”

The governor’s office and House leadership have not publicly commented on the proposal. A spokeswoman for Gov. Rick Snyder, Tanya Baker, said he will carefully consider any bill reaching his desk, while House Speaker Tom Leonard, R-DeWitt, said he is willing to have conversations on school safety but is “going to continue to stay focused on mental health.”

Senate leadership showed more enthusiasm for the idea. Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof, a Republican from West Olive, said “at this point we could use any volunteers that would want to protect our kids.”

Runestad said vetting for interested teachers would be highly rigorous given that “there are many teachers I wouldn’t trust with a butter knife, let alone a pistol.” The upcoming bills would require selected staff members to undergo 80 hours of training, renewed every two years, though they would be paid for their time, he said. All firearms would be tucked away in a secure location, he said, such as a safe with a fingerprint lock.

“You can buy these for $100 at Costco,” Runestad said. “No one else can open them. It negates so much of what you hear about the objections.”

Rep. Brian Elder said as the husband of a teacher, the idea of most teachers electing to carry firearms isn’t realistic and he instead wants to see the House approve universal background checks.

“Nuns are not signing up to become Catholic school teachers in order to tote guns around,” the Bay City Democrat said.

Laws permitting armed staff personnel are in place in over 10 states. In Florida, legislators approved a similar bill this week despite protests from survivors of its recent shooting.

Snyder has mostly focused his public gun-control message on “red-flag” legislation. Baker, his deputy press secretary, said Snyder wants to explore the measure, which would legalize a procedure to remove guns from people determined to be too dangerous to possess them.

Leaders in both chambers expressed due-process qualms on the “red flag” proposal, which has been introduced in bills but remains stuck in committee. Leonard said Thursday that some law enforcement officials indicated “very serious concerns” about the idea. Meekhof, the Senate majority leader, compared the tip-off system to the federal No Fly List.

“A kid can’t be willy-nilly saying, ‘I don’t like this person; I’m going to make a report,” and therefore their guns are confiscated,” said Meekhof. “That’s not OK.”

Emily Durbin, a 43-year-old grassroots activist from Williamstom, said that wasn’t a fair comparison because the proposed removal is temporary and initiated by law enforcement or the individual’s loved ones.

“This is about enabling the best person to know who is at imminent risk,” said Durbin, leader of the Michigan chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America. “We think it has the best shot at preventing another national tragedy out of the many proposals floating around now.”

On Wednesday, Durbin was part of the throng of over 300 activists who descended on the steps of the Capitol and into the offices of lawmakers to tout the red flag proposal. Five states have similar laws in place, but legislation is under review in more than a dozen states.

Sgt. Tim Fitzgerald of the Michigan State Police said the department is still evaluating the wave of gun-control measures.

Democrats in Michigan’s statehouse are backing universal background checks as a response to the call to stop mentally ill people from owning guns. On Friday, the state received a “C” rating from the Giffords Law Center’s Annual Gun Law Scorecard grades on gun safety.

Elder acknowledges there is an uphill road in pushing firearm-restricting bills to receive their day on the House floor. Several gun-control bills are tied up in the House Judiciary Committee.

“Everyone has got to ask why is the Republican caucus refusing to allow us to even have the discussion on these issues,” Elder said. “If these bills actually came up … we would get Republican votes.”


Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Posted in: Firearms, Gun Control, Lawfully Armed Citizens, Legislation, Mass Casualty Attacks, Mental Illness, Politics, Public Policy, Public Safety, School Resource Officers (SROs), School Shootings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 + nineteen =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.