Nevada passes policing bills, including a ban on chokeholds

By SAM METZ AP/Report for America (08/02)

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) — Nevada took its first steps toward joining the growing number of state Legislatures throughout the United States that have revisited laws governing police conduct in light of the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, who died after an officer pressed a knee to his neck.

The state Senate and Assembly passed bills Saturday that, if signed into law, will ban the use of chokeholds and roll back protections afforded to officers during misconduct investigations in an effort to foster accountability.

After thousands of demonstrators flooded the streets of Las Vegas, Reno and other Nevada cities in late May and early June, Gov. Steve Sisolak and legislative leaders vowed to address protesters’ demands for reform.

Reform advocates, in particular, have demanded the repeal of a 2019 bill that strengthened protections for officers facing misconduct allegations, complicating statehouse Democrats’ efforts to position themselves alongside reform advocates and protesters.

The bill passed with near-unanimous support, with Democrats lining up behind its author, Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro, D-Las Vegas, despite opposition from criminal justice reform advocates.

Based on concerns raised since its passage, Cannizzaro said there was a clear need to revisit provisions both for the sake of officers and the communities they serve.

A bill she introduced Saturday to roll back certain provisions of the bill passed through its first committee hearing in the state Senate on a party-line vote, over objections from Republicans and police officer advocates who argued it would deny officers needed protections.

Progressive advocates also voiced opposition to the bill during public comment, arguing anything short of a complete repeal was insufficient action and concluding their remarks by saying “Black Lives Matter.”

Gary Peck, the former leader of the ACLU of Nevada, called the 2019 law “an utter abomination, embarrassment and just bad policy” and said Cannizzaro’s claim that its intent was to ensure labor protections didn’t make sense given the unrivaled protections already afforded to officers.

The proposal would remove limits on the use of officer testimony in civil cases, strip officers of the right to review evidence against them before testifying in departmental misconduct investigations and give victims more time to file complaints with police agencies.

If the bill passes through further Senate hearings, it will move to the Assembly and then to the Governor’s desk to be signed.

The state Assembly passed a separate bill Saturday that, if signed into law, will limit the use of chokeholds and other deadly force. It would also enshrine into law a “duty to intervene” for officers who observe unjustified uses of force and allow “only the amount of reasonable force necessary” during arrests.

The bill won bipartisan support in both chambers and will be considered on the Senate floor in the coming days.

Unlike the misconduct investigation bill, Assembly Bill 3 struck enough of a balance to win support from groups ranging from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department to the ACLU of Nevada.

The bill arrives weeks after departments in Reno and Las Vegas enacted new policies to limit the use of neck restraints. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department does not consider carotid restraints to be chokeholds, but limited their use to life-threatening situations in July.

Nevada considers carotid restraints to be chokeholds.

Retired Reno police detective Ron Dreher, speaking on behalf of the Nevada Public Safety Officers Alliance, called the bill was “anti-police and pro-criminal,” and would strip officers of tactics needed to protect and serve.

“Please do not paint the professional police officers of Nevada with the same brush as what occurred in Minneapolis,” he said.

At least a dozen state legislatures have banned chokeholds or passed other police reforms this summer, including ConnecticutColoradoMinnesota, and New York.

Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistribute

Posted in: Accusations, Arrests, Civilian Complaints, Legislation, Misconduct/Abuse of Authority, Officer Safety, Police, Police Brutality/Abuse of Authority, Policies & Practices, Use of Deadly Force, Use of Force

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

six + 7 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.