Police response to Vegas shooting divides experts – Video shows officers checking rooms on three other floors before breaching shooter’s room

This photo from police officer video body camera footage on Oct. 1, 2017, provided by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, shows officers as they breach the shooter's room during the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history by Stephen Paddock, at the Mandalay Bay Hotel in Las Vegas, released Wednesday, May 2, 2018. (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department via AP)

By KEN RITTER,  Associated Press  LAS VEGAS (AP) 05/04 — Police and hotel employees’ actions as gunfire rained from a Las Vegas resort onto an outdoor concert drew mixed reactions after newly released video showed authorities making their way through a casino and carefully checking rooms before bursting into the shooter’s suite.

Security experts and a survivor of the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history said the footage from officers’ body-worn cameras offered only a glimpse of what unfolded as police responded to the rampage and didn’t provide clues about why the gunman killed 58 people and injured hundreds last fall.”There’s no real context that gives any kind of glue to put this puzzle together,” said Brian Claypool, an attorney from Pasadena, California, who survived the Oct. 1 shooting and now represents dozens of victims and families considering suing for damages.

“What the survivors and people across this country want to see are answers,” Claypool said. “How did this happen? Why did it happen? And could this have been prevented?”

The Associated Press and other news organizations sued to obtain videos, 911 recordings, evidence logs and interview reports to shed light on the response by public agencies, emergency workers and hotel officials. Videos spanning 2½ hours were released Wednesday, and more recordings will come in batches in coming weeks.

A preliminary report released in January said Stephen Paddock meticulously planned the attack, researched police SWAT tactics, rented hotel rooms overlooking outdoor concerts and investigated potential targets in at least four U.S. cities.

This photo from an Oct. 1, 2017, police officer body camera video provided Wednesday, May 2, 2018, by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, shows an officer amid automatic weapons found after they breached the shooter’s room during the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history by Stephen Paddock, at the Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas, released. (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department via AP)

 

Police said the 64-year-old high-stakes video poker player killed himself as authorities closed in. Mehmet Erdem, a hotel operations professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said employees are trained to avoid inciting panic in guests.

“Looking at the video objectively, there’s no flags, nothing that shows any indication of negligence from the hotel management perspective,” Erdem said. “You want them to get out, but you want them to do so in an orderly manner.”

Members of the initial police team who got to Mandalay Bay didn’t know if there were multiple assailants or where they might be, Eells said.

Video showed the officers with armored shields methodically checking rooms on the 29th, 30th and 31st floors before igniting an explosive charge at the door of the shooter’s room on the 32nd.

“Every door they pass or come in contact with is a potential adversary,” said Bernard Zapor, a former agent in charge with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Milwaukee and Phoenix.

“For the amount of people who were in there, you are basically having an active-shooter scene in a small city,” Zapor said. “The complexity of this is unimaginable. I think they did everything they were supposed to do.”

Tim Bedwell, a retired North Las Vegas police lieutenant, SWAT officer and Marine, said he believed police acted too slowly. Bedwell is running against Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo to head the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.

“They should have gone directly to that room, breached that room and engaged the threat,” Bedwell said. “In this case, it has been said that Metro slowed because the shooting stopped. The problem is they didn’t know it stopped. There was still a need to treat it as an active-shooter and go direct to the threat.”

This photo from police officer video body camera footage on Oct. 1, 2017, provided by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, shows officers searching hallways during the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history by Stephen Paddock, at the Mandalay Bay Hotel in Las Vegas, released Wednesday, May 2, 2018. (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department via AP)

 

Unlike previous video released by police, the footage made public Wednesday was not stamped with time and date information.

Lombardo said this week that no one in the department would comment on the videos, and a police spokesman reiterated that Thursday.

Jim Ferrence, Lombardo’s campaign manager, said Bedwell should be ashamed of trying to score political points on a horrific act of violence.

Claypool, who escaped injury at the concert, questioned why police have not released audio of a hotel security guard alerting staff that he had been shot on the 32nd floor and why police who arrived didn’t seem to know which floor they were going to.

“Every second mattered in that shooting,” he said. “That’s where I’m upset in looking at this footage.”

___

Associated Press journalists Michael Balsamo in Los Angeles, Brian Skoloff in Phoenix and Michelle Price and Regina Garcia Cano in Las Vegas contributed to this report.

 

https://www.apnews.com/9f197c8dd0384186bf034e9e684ece89/Police-response-to-Vegas-shooting-divides-experts,-survivor

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in: Body Cameras, Counter-Terrorism, Crime & Criminals, Firearms, Homicide, Injuries, Investigations, Mass Casualty Attacks, Police, Shootings, SWAT, Tactics, Victims of Crime

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

11 − 2 =

Terms of Use for Posting Comments

Terms of Use

This site (the “Site”) is operated and maintained by Law Enforcement Education Foundation, Corporation (“Company”). Throughout the Site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Company.  The words “user,” “you” and “your” as used herein refer to you.

Please read these terms and conditions of use (“Terms of Use”) carefully before contributing content. If you do not agree to these Terms of Use, please do not contribute content. Your use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions found here .

By contributing content to the Site, you represent and warrant that you are at least eighteen (18) years old and that you have read and understand these Terms of Use and any amendments thereto and agree to be bound by them. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old or you do not agree and accept these Terms of Use, you are prohibited from contributing content.

From time to time, we may permit users to submit content to the Site.  You hereby acknowledge and agree that by submitting remarks, comments, suggestions, ideas, graphics, feedback, edits, concepts, comments, photographs, illustrations and other materials (other than personal information and/or registration information) through the Site (individually and collectively, “Submissions”), you (i) grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, translate, distribute, publish, create derivative works from and publicly display and perform such Submissions throughout the world in any media, now known or hereafter created, without attribution to you; (ii) grant us the right to pursue at law any person or entity that violates your and/or our rights in your Submissions; and (iii) forever waive any and all of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, if any, in and to your Submissions, including, without limitation, any all rights or requirements of attribution or identification of you as the author of the Submission or any derivative thereof.  We reserve the right to remove any of your Submissions from the Site, in whole or in part, without notice to you, for any reason or no reason.

Submissions are made voluntarily. Any submissions which include personally identifiable information are subject to our Privacy Policy found here .  You may not upload or otherwise publish content on the Site that (i) is confidential to you or any third party; (ii) is untrue, inaccurate, false or other than an original work of your authorship; (iii) that relates to or impersonates any other person; (iv) violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any person or entity; (v) contains any content, personally identifiable information or other information, or materials of any kind that relate or refer to any other person or entity other than the provider of the products, goods or services to which the Submission relates; or (vi) violates any law, or in any manner infringes or interferes with the rights of others, including but not limited to the use of names, information, or materials that (A) libel, defame, or invade the privacy of any third party, (B) are obscene or pornographic, (C) are harmful, threatening, offensive, abusive, harassing, vulgar, false or inaccurate, racially, sexually, ethnically or are otherwise objectionable or otherwise contrary to the laws of any place where such Submissions may be accessed; (D) constitute personal attacks on other individuals; (E) promote criminal, immoral or illegal activity; (F) promote or advertise any person, product or service or solicit funds; or (G) are deemed confidential by any contract or policy.

You are solely responsible for any Submissions you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any Submissions posted by you or any third party.

Unless approved by us in writing in advance, you agree not to: (i) provide or create a link to the Site; or (ii) create any frames at any other sites pertaining to any of the content located on the Site.

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use for Posting Comments by posting updates and/or changes to our Site.  It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes.  Your continued use of, and/or access to the Site, following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use for Posting Comments, constitutes your acceptance of those changes.